![]() In terms of the sovereign cloud framework, this criteria talks to the need to have a robust and resilient architecture, located locally within the Jurisdiction, and optimised to reflect the sensitivity and value of the data hosted on the platform whether that is at an individual customer level or more broadly at a data classification level. Here experienced and highly trained staff, following well-understood audited and documented procedures, are vetted to work with certain types of needs and will ensure that Child S has the best experience possible. Specific requirements exist for the facilities, which must be staffed by the correct people, with verified access, leveraging specific processes to track and authorize only very specific activities. For Child S, this relaxed attitude changes markedly and now location and accountability are incredibly important. The family is largely happy for the hotel to arrange things and to liaise with the other activity providers around schedules and staffing. Transport there and back is not a consideration, and these activities and movements need only be lightly recorded and audited by the parents. In terms of the analogy this represents the locations where the family will be at various times during their vacation and the impact this could have on the various family members.Ĭhild NS can quite happily be enrolled in activities both at the boutique hotel and with minimal supervision at the sport and leisure facilities at the international brand hotel, with whom the boutique hotel has an arrangement. The final criteria applied to the choice of accommodation is ‘technology’. Again, understanding the data classification and how ideally those data types should be accessed and what levels of management are enabled by what types of personnel using which systems, is critical to selecting the right sovereign cloud. ![]() As the diagram below indicates these activities can range from limited, very low-impact no access activities dictated by specific roles and rights through to a full range of access enabling a comprehensive management of all types of data. In terms of the sovereign cloud framework, this criterion relates to what people, through access, and leveraging processes can conduct by way of activities against the data, both customer and account, and service metadata. Failure to observe these strict guidelines could have dire consequences for Child S and so activities are carefully monitored and recorded. ![]() Child S, on the other hand, requires careful, specialist handling by trained personnel who have strict guidelines around the sorts of interactions they can have with Child S and the types of activities they can offer Chid S. The people running leisure, sports, or other activities can involve Child NS in those endeavours with little concern and their interaction does not need to be scrutinized and audited. ![]() In the case of Child NS (non-sensitive) there is little concern about whom those people are, i.e., coaches, and kindergarten volunteers, as well as the types of interaction such as coaching, and mentoring they might have with Child NS, as Child NS requires little specialist attention. The content of the analogy relates to the activities that people can undertake with the children. The fourth criterion applied to the choice of accommodation is ‘activities’. I now can discuss the final two assessment layers – activities and technology – and then conclude on the right approach for the data guardian’s guide to selecting a sovereign cloud. In my second blog, I talked about the first three of the five framework layers for selecting a sovereign cloud: people, access, and process. I used the analogy of planning a family holiday to discuss this. In my first post, I talked about a framework of assessment that people responsible for safeguarding corporate or public data, (data guardians) can use to evaluate whether a specific sovereign cloud offering is right for them. In the final post on the Data Guardian’s guide to selecting a sovereign cloud, I focus on the two final layers of the assessment criteria – activities and technology. ![]() Alex Tanner, Senior Staff Cloud Solutions Architect, VMware Partner Connect Cloud Provider partners, UK&I ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |